tall building
Publication

S173 Compelled FSMA Interview: What You Need to Know

In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) regulates financial markets and services. As part of its enforcement powers, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) can compel individuals to attend an interview and answer questions under Section 173 of the FSMA. This is known as a compelled interview.

If you are requested to attend a compelled interview, it is important to understand your rights and obligations. In this article, we will provide an overview of the S173 compelled FSMA interview and what you should expect.

What is a compelled interview?

A compelled interview is an interview that is required by law. Under Section 173 of the FSMA, the FCA and the PRA have the power to compel individuals to attend an interview and answer questions if they believe that the individual has information that is relevant to an investigation.

The interview may be conducted in person or by telephone, and the individual may be required to provide documents or other evidence. The interview is conducted under oath, and any false statements made during the interview can be used as evidence in court.

What happens during a compelled interview?

During a compelled interview, the interviewee will be asked questions related to the investigation. The questions may cover a range of topics, including the individual’s background, their relationship with the company or financial institution under investigation, and their knowledge of the relevant events or transactions.

The interviewee is required to answer truthfully and to the best of their knowledge. Failure to provide accurate information can result in legal consequences, including criminal charges.

What are your rights during a compelled interview?

As an interviewee, you have several rights during a compelled interview. These include the right to:

Seek legal advice: You have the right to seek legal advice before the interview and to have a legal representative present during the interview.

Remain silent: You have the right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself. However, if you choose to remain silent, this can be used as evidence against you in court.

Request a transcript: You have the right to request a copy of the interview transcript. This can be helpful if you want to review the questions and answers after the interview.

Challenge the interview: If you believe that the interview was conducted improperly, you have the right to challenge it. This may involve seeking legal advice and filing a complaint with the relevant authorities.

What are the consequences of a compelled interview?

The consequences of a compelled interview can vary depending on the circumstances. If the interviewee provides accurate information and cooperates with the investigation, they may not face any legal consequences.

However, if the interviewee provides false information or fails to cooperate, they may face legal consequences, including criminal charges. In addition, the information provided during the interview can be used as evidence in court, which can have significant implications for the interviewee and any other parties involved in the investigation.

If you are requested to attend a compelled interview under Section 173 of the FSMA, it is important to understand your rights and obligations. Seeking legal advice before the interview and having a legal representative present during the interview can help protect your interests and ensure that you are treated fairly during the process.

Our lawyers are available to assist you and provide legal advice.

Contact London 020 3753 5352 or Manchester 0161 834 7284. Alternatively you can email info@richardsonlissack.co.uk

Related

Publications

Building

The Interplay Between FRC and ACCA Investigations

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) play distinct but interconnected roles in regulati...

Buildings

FCA Moves to Streamline Removal of Unused Permissions

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK is proactively enforcing the perimeter by urging firms to review and, if necessary, remove unused re...

Building

Reasons for Trading Letter and FCA’s Preliminary Review: Untangling the Regulatory Threads

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently issued a “Reasons for Trading Letter” and launched a “Preliminary Review of Trading&#...

Building

Cryptoasset firms must comply with FCA financial promotions regime

As of 8th October 2023, all cryptoasset firms marketing to UK consumers must comply with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) financial promo...

Building

Bank account closures and CIFAS markers

Transcript of The Which? Money Podcast featuring Tim Thomas. Speaker 1 Welcome to the Which? Money podcast. Your weekly hits of money, news and person...

Building

Understanding Regulatory Investigations

Regulatory investigations can be a daunting experience for businesses and individuals alike. The consequences of non-compliance can be severe, with fi...

Credit Suisse

The takeover of Credit Suisse

The takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS has more than a flavour of the Lloyds Bank Group ‘shot-gun wedding’ with HBOS in 2009: one financial services...

2 buildings looking up at them

A guide to insider dealing

Insider dealing is a serious charge, one that comes with considerable consequences if an individual is found guilty. It’s a complex area of law whic...

2 buildings looking up at them

CIFAS Markers: Data subject access request (DSAR)

What is a Cifas marker? CIFAS stands for ‘Credit Industry Fraud Avoidance System‘, a not-for-profit fraud prevention membership organisation. It o...

2 buildings looking up at them

What you need to know about CIFAS markers

National Fraud Database CIFAS fraud markers are adverse judgements through which one institution, be it a bank, loan company or an insurer, for exampl...

2 buildings looking up at them

Tim Thomas quoted in Bloomberg in relation to the PCP v Barclays case

Following the release of the judgment in PCP and Barclays, one of our directors, Tim Thomas, spoke to Bloomberg about the potential repercussions for ...

2 buildings looking up at them

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) leak: UHNWI’s – the wrong target?

The FinCEN leak will surprise no experienced lawyers advising UHNWIs (Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals) and their professional advisers.  The irony o...

2 buildings looking up at them

The FCA and cannabis: an unlikely pairing?

The recent announcement by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) of guidance for companies in the medicinal cannabis sector, thinking about listing on...

Furloughed Individual

Furlough fraud: what lies ahead?

Furlough fraud claims are on the rise.  Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) together with whistleblowing organisations are reporting thousan...

Let’s work together

Contact Us

arrow-downarrow-left-greyarrow-leftarrow-right-0c2535 arrow-right-ffffff arrow-right-greyarrow-rightbullet-icon-whitebullet-iconcloseicon-connecticon-cross-double icon-cross-right icon-email icon-nav-lefticon-nav-righticon-phoneicon-pinicon-reachlawyer-linkedin-icon nav-menu-arrow rl-logo-icon social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtube