Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Enforcement Investigations

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is the primary regulator for the conduct of individuals and companies who operate in the Financial Services sector.  That sector is now enormous. It encompasses the provisions of ‘vanilla’ financial services to the consumer (traditional high street banking – accounts, mortgages), to share trading by individuals and investment banks (buying and selling of shares/options/futures on FTSE100 and AIM and any other regulated market), to loans under the Consumer Credit Act (car financing loans) and the murky world of binary options.


Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Enforcement Investigations

In accordance with the breadth of the sector, the FCA’s enforcement activity now ranges from investigating criminal conduct:

  • insider dealing (buying and/or selling shares based on non-public information)
  • misleading statements to individuals and markets (dishonest statements to induce other parties to act in a certain way)
  • breaches of the general prohibition (undertaking the provision of financial services activity without FCA permission to do so) and
  • breaches of the money laundering regulations (insufficient due diligence)

and regulatory breaches of:

  • the Senior Managers and
    Certification Regime (SMCR) (conduct that is not ‘fit and proper’); and
  • the
    Principles for Businesses (PRIN) (demonstrating a lack of integrity; failing to
    conduct business with due skill care and diligence; failing to treat customers
    fairly; providing unsuitable advice).

Financial Services & Markets Act 2000

The FCA derives its power to regulate from the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000 (‘FSMA’). FSMA gives significant powers to the FCA’s Enforcement & Market Oversight Division (‘EMO’) to open enforcement investigations.  FSMA provides the FCA with a considerable suite of information gathering powers such as the power to compel information and also seize it.

The FCA is also unusual in that although it is a UK government agency it is also a limited company and funded through subscription by the financial services industry.

The combination of a power to compel and a proper budget for enforcement investigations make EMO a formidable force: it is methodical, thorough and certainly not speedy.

What is a dual-track investigation

All EMO enforcement investigations are now opened on a ‘dual-track’ basis. A dual track investigation is one where the conduct is viewed in the context of a potential regulatory breach and suspected commission of a criminal offence.

What is the power to compel (s171-175)?

When FCA enforcement investigators are appointed to look at an individual or company’s conduct they do so with the ability to use all the powers available in FSMA (s167 -168). Those powers included the power to compel information (s171-175) and apply for criminal search warrants (s176).

The power to compel information (s171-175) in the form of answers to questions but also in the supply of physical documents is not to be underestimated. The power can be exercised not only in relation to the subject of the investigation but also any other party who may hold information that is relevant.  Only the Serious Fraud Office has a similar power (s2 Criminal Justice Act 1987).

Non-compliance with a compelled request can result in prosecution (s177) and the FCA has shown a willingness to pursue such action: Konstantin Vishnyak was under investigation by the FCA for suspected insider dealing offences and the FCA allege that he deleted a WhatsApp application on his mobile phone after he was required to provide it as part of the investigation.

Richardson Lissack’s approach to FCA enforcement investigations

Richardson Lissack’s approach to FCA enforcement investigations is holistic. It will often be unclear whether EMO will pursue a criminal or civil sanction and as outlined above such a decision can be deferred for a considerable period.

Individuals and companies need to be prepared equally for argument in the criminal courts and in front of the Regulatory Decisions Committee (the FCA’s own internal committee that is the arbiter of whether a civil financial penalty requested by EMO is fair).

Richardson Lissack has substantial experience of successfully guiding subjects of FCA enforcement investigations through what is a long and stressful process.  That ability to achieve a successful outcome for clients is enhanced by the experience of the head of the firm’s Financial Services regulatory team as a former FCA enforcement lawyer.

Prevention is better than a cure

How Richardson Lissack can help

Our lawyers are available to assist you and provide legal advice.

Contact London 020 3753 5352 or Manchester 0161 834 7284. Alternatively you can email




The Interplay Between FRC and ACCA Investigations

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) play distinct but interconnected roles in regulati...


FCA Moves to Streamline Removal of Unused Permissions

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK is proactively enforcing the perimeter by urging firms to review and, if necessary, remove unused re...


Reasons for Trading Letter and FCA’s Preliminary Review: Untangling the Regulatory Threads

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently issued a “Reasons for Trading Letter” and launched a “Preliminary Review of Trading&#...


Cryptoasset firms must comply with FCA financial promotions regime

As of 8th October 2023, all cryptoasset firms marketing to UK consumers must comply with the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) financial promo...


Bank account closures and CIFAS markers

Transcript of The Which? Money Podcast featuring Tim Thomas. Speaker 1 Welcome to the Which? Money podcast. Your weekly hits of money, news and person...


Understanding Regulatory Investigations

Regulatory investigations can be a daunting experience for businesses and individuals alike. The consequences of non-compliance can be severe, with fi...

tall building

S173 Compelled FSMA Interview: What You Need to Know

In the United Kingdom, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) regulates financial markets and services. As part of its enforcement powers,...

Credit Suisse

The takeover of Credit Suisse

The takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS has more than a flavour of the Lloyds Bank Group ‘shot-gun wedding’ with HBOS in 2009: one financial services...

2 buildings looking up at them

A guide to insider dealing

Insider dealing is a serious charge, one that comes with considerable consequences if an individual is found guilty. It’s a complex area of law whic...

2 buildings looking up at them

CIFAS Markers: Data subject access request (DSAR)

What is a Cifas marker? CIFAS stands for ‘Credit Industry Fraud Avoidance System‘, a not-for-profit fraud prevention membership organisation. It o...

2 buildings looking up at them

What you need to know about CIFAS markers

National Fraud Database CIFAS fraud markers are adverse judgements through which one institution, be it a bank, loan company or an insurer, for exampl...

2 buildings looking up at them

Tim Thomas quoted in Bloomberg in relation to the PCP v Barclays case

Following the release of the judgment in PCP and Barclays, one of our directors, Tim Thomas, spoke to Bloomberg about the potential repercussions for ...

2 buildings looking up at them

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) leak: UHNWI’s – the wrong target?

The FinCEN leak will surprise no experienced lawyers advising UHNWIs (Ultra-High Net Worth Individuals) and their professional advisers.  The irony o...

2 buildings looking up at them

The FCA and cannabis: an unlikely pairing?

The recent announcement by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) of guidance for companies in the medicinal cannabis sector, thinking about listing on...

Furloughed Individual

Furlough fraud: what lies ahead?

Furlough fraud claims are on the rise.  Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) together with whistleblowing organisations are reporting thousan...

Committed to exceeding expectations

Our team of experts

Tim Thomas
Tim Thomas

“From the day we appointed Tim and his team, the communication with us was outstanding, always at the end of the phone or email, more than often outside office hours, with a fantastic level of knowledge.”

Viviana Silva
Viviana Silva

“Viviana is amazing she goes above and beyond in her support for the client. I want to give Viviana an extra thanks because she was always there making sure I felt ok, was always making an extra effort to help me with any difficulty I had and also like Kim she was always there after work hours to reassure me and calm me down if I was having a meltdown moment of worry or panic.”

View team
Let’s work together

Contact Us

arrow-downarrow-left-greyarrow-leftarrow-right-0c2535 arrow-right-ffffff arrow-right-greyarrow-rightbullet-icon-whitebullet-iconcloseicon-connecticon-cross-double icon-cross-right icon-email icon-nav-lefticon-nav-righticon-phoneicon-pinicon-reachlawyer-linkedin-icon nav-menu-arrow rl-logo-icon social_facebooksocial_googleplussocial_instagramsocial_linkedin_altsocial_linkedin_altsocial_pinterestlogo-twitter-glyph-32social_youtube